clusterfuck = goons + pets

Now, let's try to understand reddit. It's about posting cat pictures and image macros, right?

Unless you are all drunk and target each instead of the retreiver other for some odd reason.

LMFAO

Did you mean ISO 31000:2009 though? (if talking Risk Management)

Good read (if you're into collecting Fungus, Spores and Mucus samples or can't sleep at night).

Carry on though .. had to say something because of profession and found your comment genuinely funny :O

Masterminds are another word that comes up all the time.
You keep hearing about these terrorists masterminds that get killed in the middle east.
Terrorists masterminds.
Mastermind is sort of a lofty way to describe what these guys do, don't you think?
They're not masterminds.
"OK, you take bomb, right? And you put in your backpack. And you get on bus and you blow yourself up. Alright?"
"Why do I have to blow myself up? Why can't I just:"
"Who's the ******* mastermind here? Me or you?"

It's in comment to baltec's statement "These are all risks currently faced by suicide gankers in high sec."

Fact is there are no "risks", it is calculated loses. There is no skill, it is all procedure.

It is carebear pvp. PVP being it involves another player. Not that they can actually attack back.

Wuos, The Forge.

We have also taken out several bonus Tengu and many Orca.

So, being criminally flagged in High Sec for 30 days by multiple entities is not risky.

Got it.

Maybe you need War Dec to understand how risky that proposition indeed is.

It is not a risk. It is a result of your actions. You don't want the flag, don't do the ganking. It is your decision.

Yea, go wardec some more noobs, miners

You are the carebears that scan down targets with alts, calculate their defenses, and then attack, but only if no one else is around that can attack back.

Seems so, Scatim. Well we best get back to ice miner mining.

I'm sitting here talking to someone on voice coms hunting goons with public kill rights. Also there are defender fleets now in Osmon with Blackbirds and other ECM stuff. Not sure on their effectiveness.

And that does not include the amount that just went away because the loot fairy said no.

But I didn't contradict myself? You evidently just lack the requisite background knowledge (I blame the school system).

So, is your contention that the original formula was correct? I don't understand why you won't answer a very simple question. Well, I do, but you should answer it anyway.

Is that where the new ice anoms come from after they are depleted?

So far she's been wrong in every objective fight she's committed to; including but not limited to:

past forum events, the formal definition of risk, and compound probability of dependent events

All of which were explained and appropriately cited. I'm not sure what your definition of "comes out on top" is, but it doesn't seem particularly useful. Is it a popularity thing? I'll happily concede popularity.



You'd be surprised how hard it is to get hostile-forum goers to understand technical topics you know well, but which rely on years of foundational knowledge. If it comes off sounding boastful, I apologize.

Also, rofl @ "pretty much requires quantum computing"

Not on my EVE Online General Discussion.

Only trolling skillZ.

I'm all ears if you have some pointers; it's not something I'm good at.

However, I might point out that while getting people to smile and nod is a very useful skill, it doesn't seem appropriate here.

When did they start measuring IQ in degrees Celcius?

Funny post of Mr. "automotive telematics and control systems" aka "Look at me mummy blabla". Wouldnt be surprised if alt of Tippia. Please continue. But beware of your signature.

i think that's a compliment, jonah

It wasn't you in particular but someone on your side did say mining had less risk than ganking.

Do you agree or no?

I mean its possibly my mistake for assuming that everyone that it taking the one side has different opinion on it.

I mean I did ask a few gankers in various chats and most of them said they felt they risked less than the miners in the ganking or otherwise they wouldn't be doing it.

It can be mitigated, but if 15 catalysts (or equivalent ships) decide to gank a mining ship, there is little doubt in the outcome.

You can watch local and standings, but if I took my freshly made alt who has a standings of 0 and is in an NPC corp and decided to use a battlecruiser to gank a tanked mack, there is little they can do about it.

Does this mean we can now call Chribba "Grampy" ?

Our Chribba, who art in the belt.
Hallowed be thy Veldnaught.
Thy ore be mined.
Hidden belts we find.
In 0.0 as it is in Empire.
Give us this day our daily Veldspar.
And forgive us our ore theft,
As we forgive those who thieve against us.
And lead us not into gate camps,
But deliver us from pirates.
For thine is the ore,
and the ice, and the moons,
for ever and ever.
Amen.

I think the prices reflect how much of a fail this ice interdiction has been. 90% of the miners I know are still harvesting ice at the same rate and have barely ever even seen you guys in system.

Step up your game goons, everyone is laughing right now .